« What's Your Email Address Saying About Your Company? | Main | Should Hospitals Focus on Eliminating Their Agency Staff? »

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0111684bfa6f970c0120a7aa1428970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Symbio Solutions Files for Bankruptcy:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mike Wheeden

Hey Jason:

Hope you are well....saw the article on Symbio. They certainly had some false starts around the DC Metro area.

Don't forget about your friends at B4Health as an end to end workforce scheduling/staffing automation tool and VMS...still going strong!

Cheers

Mike Wheeden
301-652-0444

Jason Lander

Hi Mike,

I always saw you guys as more of an internal staff scheduling system. If this is incorrect and in fact you also provide VMS to hospitals please let me know so I can be sure to be more accurate in the future.

Candace Berk

Jason
Late to respond and relatively new joiner of your blog..

.. But I have to throw in another significant player in the vendor neutral space, my company, COMFORCE.

Comforce has over $2Billion in spend and almost 20 years in VMS - pioneers. Yes, much of the $2 Billion is commercial but our Healthcare VMS solution has been around 8+ years and has a significant list of clients and growing alliances.

With that said, I respect all the significant VMS players. In the end, it comes down to the clients desire for neutrality, full service options, technology, and the relationship.

Keep blogging, this site is great.

Candace

Jason Lander

Hey Candace!

Thanks for the comment. Comforce is a big player in this space. However, I don't list them as being vendor neutral because they aren't. Many staffing agencies promote a 'vendor neutral' offering. However, it's just marketing.

If a company is owned by a staffing agency or advocates for a staffing agency over other agencies it is not vendor neutral. Even if the company is truly allowing the orders to be distributed equally they simply cannot be counted as vendor neutral because 1) they still supply staff and make a significant portion of their revenue from doing so 2) They have access to the data of their competitors and own that data since it's flowing through their system.

Companies such as Comforce (and other agencies) started spinning themselves as being vendor neutral when the term and acceptance of the vendor neutral model started gaining traction. I think it was unnecessary, as it didn't help them differentiate their model and better promote their benefits. Now that vendor neutrality doesn't seem to matter so much, it would be nice to see them simply promoting the benefits of their model, as opposed to trying to jump on to the popularity of another.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Healthcare Staffing Website Design & Marketing

Healthcare Staffing Agency Website Design and Marketing

Read The Healthcare Staffing Report

Healthcare Staffing News

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 02/2009

    • Clicky Web Analytics

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Me Around the Web

    Facebook LinkedIn Twitter TypePad

    Healthcare Staffing Search Engines

    Basecamp